I'm pretty sure that the song stems from the whole desire to end conflict to which no one really sees an end to because it's become a part of character than about the conflict itself.
I think it's probably a form of resistance to the future, but it might have been supposed to be ironic because if one transposes the idea behind the pocket knives and the idea of the arms, it implies distrust.
But I have a feeling that weeddemon was right in some way because neither the singer nor the addressed wants weapons at reach, whatever their clash, it is to be done without the use of any externals. The whole idea of walking through fire is something of a trial and that's an entirely individual concept, one does that to oneself for a greater purpose that transcends ordinary human notions.
I guess this requires more thinking but one might have to think of the singer as either a lover or a mentor whose desire to be with or to teach is greater than any human ego.
I'm pretty sure that the song stems from the whole desire to end conflict to which no one really sees an end to because it's become a part of character than about the conflict itself.
I think it's probably a form of resistance to the future, but it might have been supposed to be ironic because if one transposes the idea behind the pocket knives and the idea of the arms, it implies distrust.
But I have a feeling that weeddemon was right in some way because neither the singer nor the addressed wants weapons at reach, whatever their clash, it is to be done without the use of any externals. The whole idea of walking through fire is something of a trial and that's an entirely individual concept, one does that to oneself for a greater purpose that transcends ordinary human notions.
I guess this requires more thinking but one might have to think of the singer as either a lover or a mentor whose desire to be with or to teach is greater than any human ego.
you are amazing.
you are amazing.
@genericme great interpretation. A+
@genericme great interpretation. A+