How Conway got away with this verseless/chorusless song is beyond me. It's so very much Feminist Studies 101. And that it gained such popularity in the epitome of misogyny called Australia is even more confounding.
@exobscura Your point being? Seriously. I think the only reason it still gets air - play is the (ummahhh....) word... It's the anal humor and lack of self-insight so common among those of the better gender.
@exobscura Your point being? Seriously. I think the only reason it still gets air - play is the (ummahhh....) word... It's the anal humor and lack of self-insight so common among those of the better gender.
@exobscura Isn't one competing perspective (perhaps among several) that the song is cynically, caustically, reflecting on a particular relationship, rather than anything more broad or categorical, such as an entire gender?
@exobscura Isn't one competing perspective (perhaps among several) that the song is cynically, caustically, reflecting on a particular relationship, rather than anything more broad or categorical, such as an entire gender?
Moreover if your premise is correct about the extent of misogyny in Australia (on which I'm not venturing to comment), wouldn't that be a reason for lyrics drawn out of "Feminist Studies 101" (assuming that to be so) to in fact be popular?
Moreover if your premise is correct about the extent of misogyny in Australia (on which I'm not venturing to comment), wouldn't that be a reason for lyrics drawn out of "Feminist Studies 101" (assuming that to be so) to in fact be popular?
@exobscura
garbageguts68 That's a completely Foucualtian way to assess the situation if you ignore the innate Chomskyian categorical imperative first derived from the pseudo-Baudrillardian premise et al
@exobscura
garbageguts68 That's a completely Foucualtian way to assess the situation if you ignore the innate Chomskyian categorical imperative first derived from the pseudo-Baudrillardian premise et al
How Conway got away with this verseless/chorusless song is beyond me. It's so very much Feminist Studies 101. And that it gained such popularity in the epitome of misogyny called Australia is even more confounding.
Do-Re-Mi-Far- So-Low
@exobscura Your point being?
@exobscura Your point being?
@exobscura Your point being? Seriously. I think the only reason it still gets air - play is the (ummahhh....) word... It's the anal humor and lack of self-insight so common among those of the better gender.
@exobscura Your point being? Seriously. I think the only reason it still gets air - play is the (ummahhh....) word... It's the anal humor and lack of self-insight so common among those of the better gender.
@exobscura What is your point? Or are you just trying to prove you have been to University.
@exobscura What is your point? Or are you just trying to prove you have been to University.
@exobscura Isn't one competing perspective (perhaps among several) that the song is cynically, caustically, reflecting on a particular relationship, rather than anything more broad or categorical, such as an entire gender?
@exobscura Isn't one competing perspective (perhaps among several) that the song is cynically, caustically, reflecting on a particular relationship, rather than anything more broad or categorical, such as an entire gender?
Moreover if your premise is correct about the extent of misogyny in Australia (on which I'm not venturing to comment), wouldn't that be a reason for lyrics drawn out of "Feminist Studies 101" (assuming that to be so) to in fact be popular?
Moreover if your premise is correct about the extent of misogyny in Australia (on which I'm not venturing to comment), wouldn't that be a reason for lyrics drawn out of "Feminist Studies 101" (assuming that to be so) to in fact be popular?
@exobscura garbageguts68 That's a completely Foucualtian way to assess the situation if you ignore the innate Chomskyian categorical imperative first derived from the pseudo-Baudrillardian premise et al
@exobscura garbageguts68 That's a completely Foucualtian way to assess the situation if you ignore the innate Chomskyian categorical imperative first derived from the pseudo-Baudrillardian premise et al