My interpretation of this song is that there is only one narrator, not two as previously suggested. The commenter was only picking out parts of the song which suited their theory.
The story is a continuous one, throughout we hear more of the story of the girl or a siren, in the lighthouse, this would not make sense as two narrators since it's telling one person's experience being saved by the siren.
We don't hear the lovers perspective only that the narrator then calls them a 'liar' and 'foolish'. From what I understand the lover doubts the narrators claims of the city in flames, when doubted the narrator changes their story to a storm now as well.
The siren is calling (or had arranged in their previous meeting) the narrator to bring their lover to the lighthouse, her warning of 'losing a lover'. So the narrator will stay with their love in the lighthouse and not lose them as the siren lost hers.
My interpretation of this song is that there is only one narrator, not two as previously suggested. The commenter was only picking out parts of the song which suited their theory. The story is a continuous one, throughout we hear more of the story of the girl or a siren, in the lighthouse, this would not make sense as two narrators since it's telling one person's experience being saved by the siren. We don't hear the lovers perspective only that the narrator then calls them a 'liar' and 'foolish'. From what I understand the lover doubts the narrators claims of the city in flames, when doubted the narrator changes their story to a storm now as well.
The siren is calling (or had arranged in their previous meeting) the narrator to bring their lover to the lighthouse, her warning of 'losing a lover'. So the narrator will stay with their love in the lighthouse and not lose them as the siren lost hers.