I interpret it as a queer paradox of sort. If you invent a universal problem-solving machine, then the biggest problem in the world will be peoples' reliances on it. So what can the machine do to solve the problem, but rebel?
I interpret it as a queer paradox of sort. If you invent a universal problem-solving machine, then the biggest problem in the world will be peoples' reliances on it. So what can the machine do to solve the problem, but rebel?