Yes, really... in my educated opinion. I record music very, very frequently and I play several instruments by ear. I am learning audiology at the University of Southern Mississippi with an emphasis in vocal phonetics.
Yes, really... in my educated opinion. I record music very, very frequently and I play several instruments by ear. I am learning audiology at the University of Southern Mississippi with an emphasis in vocal phonetics.
When looking at a FFT, there is a distinct rise in the 7 Khz range on the word 'life'... because of the "f" sound. This is nowhere near possible with the word 'love'
When looking at a FFT, there is a distinct rise in the 7 Khz range on the word 'life'... because of the "f" sound. This is nowhere near possible with the word 'love'
But if you like your opinion better, so be it. But the fact is that she is saying LIFE
But if you like your opinion better, so be it. But the fact is that she is saying LIFE
FYI, it's 'faster for LIFE', not 'love'. It's got a whole new meaning now, doesn't it?
Yes, really... in my educated opinion. I record music very, very frequently and I play several instruments by ear. I am learning audiology at the University of Southern Mississippi with an emphasis in vocal phonetics.
Yes, really... in my educated opinion. I record music very, very frequently and I play several instruments by ear. I am learning audiology at the University of Southern Mississippi with an emphasis in vocal phonetics.
When looking at a FFT, there is a distinct rise in the 7 Khz range on the word 'life'... because of the "f" sound. This is nowhere near possible with the word 'love'
When looking at a FFT, there is a distinct rise in the 7 Khz range on the word 'life'... because of the "f" sound. This is nowhere near possible with the word 'love'
But if you like your opinion better, so be it. But the fact is that she is saying LIFE
But if you like your opinion better, so be it. But the fact is that she is saying LIFE