sheer, you are making one of the great weaknessess of the anti biblical arguement quite clear, you seem to think that God is bound by natural laws, and that just because you believe something doesn't make it real. Bing bang theorists believe in anti-matter, and NONE has been discovered, as for information coming from nothing, it didn't, it came from God, it clearly states in the Bible "In the beginning was the Word (Jesus, being the word of truth), and the Word was God, and Was with God. God is a default, Christianity (true christianity) is based soley off of the Word of God, and the Bible, no one can disprove a single sentence, person, or idea in the Bible, you seem to be under the impression that what our so-called science today states is infallible. It is not science vs. God, it is what non- christian scientists believe vs God's truth.
In point of fact, I'm pretty sure that antimatter has been synthesized. However, that's not even really that important to my case. Information has always existed. Will always exist. Can't be made to cease to exist. But in fact, we're now having a semantic argument because you would call the infinite set of infinite sets a part of God ("in the beginning was the word") and then find that we're in complete agreement.
In point of fact, I'm pretty sure that antimatter has been synthesized. However, that's not even really that important to my case. Information has always existed. Will always exist. Can't be made to cease to exist. But in fact, we're now having a semantic argument because you would call the infinite set of infinite sets a part of God ("in the beginning was the word") and then find that we're in complete agreement.
It can't be science vs. God because science is a part of God. I can casually disprove large amounts of the bible - or show...
It can't be science vs. God because science is a part of God. I can casually disprove large amounts of the bible - or show you how they were written by people who had not yet achieved the lofty heights we hang out in in the 21st century.. but I'm not going to. Why? Well, first, because I'd hate to succeed if succeeding made you unhappy.. I have no need to hurt you and I really hope that we're both allowed to be "right" as far as our subjective realities at the same time. Second, because our beliefs form a filter which mask part of the infinity that we're submersed in.
I should add that I'm not really the same Sheer that posted that first post - I've had two years of growing and learning and I have spent a lot of time in those two years thinking about spiritual matters. That Sheer was deeply angry at Christianity for something that wasn't the fault of the religion. This Sheer understands that a lot of the things that he believes line up with the beliefs of Christians, and the places where there are differences, I believe there's more wonder here than the bible would ever credit. I see the bible as God's true message warped by the limits of the people who set pen to paper, and I don't blame them or fault them because I have many of the same limits and I've been learning how hard it is to grok and accept unconditional love.
I also doubt that any message I would give you showing the limits of the Bible would make it through your input filters. But, if you're happy, who am I to judge you? If you're not, I'm sure the same angels that help me understand how the problem is in my mind and my beliefs are available to you, and they can do a much better job of helping you change your thoughts and beliefs than I can.
sheer, you are making one of the great weaknessess of the anti biblical arguement quite clear, you seem to think that God is bound by natural laws, and that just because you believe something doesn't make it real. Bing bang theorists believe in anti-matter, and NONE has been discovered, as for information coming from nothing, it didn't, it came from God, it clearly states in the Bible "In the beginning was the Word (Jesus, being the word of truth), and the Word was God, and Was with God. God is a default, Christianity (true christianity) is based soley off of the Word of God, and the Bible, no one can disprove a single sentence, person, or idea in the Bible, you seem to be under the impression that what our so-called science today states is infallible. It is not science vs. God, it is what non- christian scientists believe vs God's truth.
In point of fact, I'm pretty sure that antimatter has been synthesized. However, that's not even really that important to my case. Information has always existed. Will always exist. Can't be made to cease to exist. But in fact, we're now having a semantic argument because you would call the infinite set of infinite sets a part of God ("in the beginning was the word") and then find that we're in complete agreement.
In point of fact, I'm pretty sure that antimatter has been synthesized. However, that's not even really that important to my case. Information has always existed. Will always exist. Can't be made to cease to exist. But in fact, we're now having a semantic argument because you would call the infinite set of infinite sets a part of God ("in the beginning was the word") and then find that we're in complete agreement.
It can't be science vs. God because science is a part of God. I can casually disprove large amounts of the bible - or show...
It can't be science vs. God because science is a part of God. I can casually disprove large amounts of the bible - or show you how they were written by people who had not yet achieved the lofty heights we hang out in in the 21st century.. but I'm not going to. Why? Well, first, because I'd hate to succeed if succeeding made you unhappy.. I have no need to hurt you and I really hope that we're both allowed to be "right" as far as our subjective realities at the same time. Second, because our beliefs form a filter which mask part of the infinity that we're submersed in.
I should add that I'm not really the same Sheer that posted that first post - I've had two years of growing and learning and I have spent a lot of time in those two years thinking about spiritual matters. That Sheer was deeply angry at Christianity for something that wasn't the fault of the religion. This Sheer understands that a lot of the things that he believes line up with the beliefs of Christians, and the places where there are differences, I believe there's more wonder here than the bible would ever credit. I see the bible as God's true message warped by the limits of the people who set pen to paper, and I don't blame them or fault them because I have many of the same limits and I've been learning how hard it is to grok and accept unconditional love.
I also doubt that any message I would give you showing the limits of the Bible would make it through your input filters. But, if you're happy, who am I to judge you? If you're not, I'm sure the same angels that help me understand how the problem is in my mind and my beliefs are available to you, and they can do a much better job of helping you change your thoughts and beliefs than I can.
Pray hard! :-)