@epicmikenomore In regards to the second part of your sentence, be careful about a literal interpretation of this final portion of the song. It seems to be misleading. A human invasiveness in regards to what is referred to as nature seems to be one of the main reasons for the spreading of the virus responsible for said disease. It therefore should be seen as an exaggeration out of an understandable aversion respectively concern for said invasive tendencies and not as a result of some experiment in so called biological technology.
Interestingly, for the longest time have I memorised, or adapted in...
@epicmikenomore In regards to the second part of your sentence, be careful about a literal interpretation of this final portion of the song. It seems to be misleading. A human invasiveness in regards to what is referred to as nature seems to be one of the main reasons for the spreading of the virus responsible for said disease. It therefore should be seen as an exaggeration out of an understandable aversion respectively concern for said invasive tendencies and not as a result of some experiment in so called biological technology.
Interestingly, for the longest time have I memorised, or adapted in my imagination, the line about “cut-throat” as “control”. As control corporations, read control entities, and ultimately what is referred to as governments who can partake in the sense of being responsible for lax regulations. Also, trying to publish a first version of this paragraph elsewhere, the geni(o)uses in charge there seem to have drastically limited the available amount of characters. Invasive tendencies on one hand, simplifications and capricious limitations on the other. A wonderful world it is, indeed.
It's about biotechnology creating even worse things, including AIDS
@epicmikenomore In regards to the second part of your sentence, be careful about a literal interpretation of this final portion of the song. It seems to be misleading. A human invasiveness in regards to what is referred to as nature seems to be one of the main reasons for the spreading of the virus responsible for said disease. It therefore should be seen as an exaggeration out of an understandable aversion respectively concern for said invasive tendencies and not as a result of some experiment in so called biological technology. Interestingly, for the longest time have I memorised, or adapted in...
@epicmikenomore In regards to the second part of your sentence, be careful about a literal interpretation of this final portion of the song. It seems to be misleading. A human invasiveness in regards to what is referred to as nature seems to be one of the main reasons for the spreading of the virus responsible for said disease. It therefore should be seen as an exaggeration out of an understandable aversion respectively concern for said invasive tendencies and not as a result of some experiment in so called biological technology. Interestingly, for the longest time have I memorised, or adapted in my imagination, the line about “cut-throat” as “control”. As control corporations, read control entities, and ultimately what is referred to as governments who can partake in the sense of being responsible for lax regulations. Also, trying to publish a first version of this paragraph elsewhere, the geni(o)uses in charge there seem to have drastically limited the available amount of characters. Invasive tendencies on one hand, simplifications and capricious limitations on the other. A wonderful world it is, indeed.