people who are "hating" on these lyrics just haven't analysed them enough.
1) "I'm hot cause I'm fly."
2) "you aint (hot) cause your not (fly)"
3) rearanging statement 1 gives "fly implies hot"
4) rearanging statement 2 gives "not fly implies not hot"
5) statement 4 proves that "hot implies fly"
6) "hot implies fly" and "fly implies hot" means that the two sets are equivalent!
MIMS statements mathematically show that "hot" and "fly" are in fact different words for the exact same thing. there is no difference between the two!
maybe this is his attempt to teach discrete mathematics to his audience which is very philanthropic of him... Then again maybe i've read to much into it and his lyrics ARE actually shallow, poorly thought out dross.
people who are "hating" on these lyrics just haven't analysed them enough.
1) "I'm hot cause I'm fly." 2) "you aint (hot) cause your not (fly)"
3) rearanging statement 1 gives "fly implies hot" 4) rearanging statement 2 gives "not fly implies not hot" 5) statement 4 proves that "hot implies fly" 6) "hot implies fly" and "fly implies hot" means that the two sets are equivalent!
MIMS statements mathematically show that "hot" and "fly" are in fact different words for the exact same thing. there is no difference between the two!
maybe this is his attempt to teach discrete mathematics to his audience which is very philanthropic of him... Then again maybe i've read to much into it and his lyrics ARE actually shallow, poorly thought out dross.