dan rathbun is pretty clear in the liner notes that this is a political song, but he seems to be more put off by the hyperpartisanship of politics than about any one particular politician.
also i don't think anyone could honestly describe the oratorically challenged bush as being able to "move great masses with his mouth." barack obama, maybe? :D
@liquorton gooksberg I'm pretty sure this is about moral character and the kind of moral characer that rises to power, rather than any partisanship although you could argue that partisans (of "both sides" of concentrated power) are generally described in the first part of the song.
@liquorton gooksberg I'm pretty sure this is about moral character and the kind of moral characer that rises to power, rather than any partisanship although you could argue that partisans (of "both sides" of concentrated power) are generally described in the first part of the song.
dan rathbun is pretty clear in the liner notes that this is a political song, but he seems to be more put off by the hyperpartisanship of politics than about any one particular politician.
also i don't think anyone could honestly describe the oratorically challenged bush as being able to "move great masses with his mouth." barack obama, maybe? :D
@liquorton gooksberg I'm pretty sure this is about moral character and the kind of moral characer that rises to power, rather than any partisanship although you could argue that partisans (of "both sides" of concentrated power) are generally described in the first part of the song.
@liquorton gooksberg I'm pretty sure this is about moral character and the kind of moral characer that rises to power, rather than any partisanship although you could argue that partisans (of "both sides" of concentrated power) are generally described in the first part of the song.