I think that its showing he got so caught up into someone he started to neglect god somewhat. and that the part where it looks like an arguement is a flash back talking about the person. but then towards the end it moves to the present showing that god forgives him and that he shouldn't have negelcted god because god would never neglect him back.. anyone agree?
I think that its showing he got so caught up into someone he started to neglect god somewhat. and that the part where it looks like an arguement is a flash back talking about the person. but then towards the end it moves to the present showing that god forgives him and that he shouldn't have negelcted god because god would never neglect him back.. anyone agree?