pbrazil: "Proficiency" is a very nice word, I will grant you, but there are others that are more worthy of being used three times in the space of one paragraph. "And," for instance.
Look, it's a toss-off little intro, hardly worthy of criticism with words such as "unavailing" or "innate proficiency" unless one has a serious chip on one's shoulder. Granted, I'm not sure I would have opened the album with it. (There's a weird little part of me that just might have swapped it with "Fat Slut.")
While I don't hate GWB, I think it's entirely fair to suggest that he considers himself a king of sorts. As "the decider," he has worked nonstop to expand the power of the executive branch, at the expense of the other two. As an independent, I suspect that this is a powderkeg. So do many conservatives -- and just wait until the next liberal gets to the White House and uses GWB's fondness for "signing statements" as a precedent. The hypocritical backpedaling is going to be hilarious.
pbrazil: "Proficiency" is a very nice word, I will grant you, but there are others that are more worthy of being used three times in the space of one paragraph. "And," for instance.
Look, it's a toss-off little intro, hardly worthy of criticism with words such as "unavailing" or "innate proficiency" unless one has a serious chip on one's shoulder. Granted, I'm not sure I would have opened the album with it. (There's a weird little part of me that just might have swapped it with "Fat Slut.")
While I don't hate GWB, I think it's entirely fair to suggest that he considers himself a king of sorts. As "the decider," he has worked nonstop to expand the power of the executive branch, at the expense of the other two. As an independent, I suspect that this is a powderkeg. So do many conservatives -- and just wait until the next liberal gets to the White House and uses GWB's fondness for "signing statements" as a precedent. The hypocritical backpedaling is going to be hilarious.