Again your retarded criticalthinking you told @deathofhonor in a previous comment "it's what you think someone meant who themselves where quoting someone else and taking the quote out of it's context and giving it a completely new meaning." Your doing the exact same thing. Try not to contradict yourself when you tell someone they're wrong. Cause in reality, the only one who's wrong is you. Music is an art. Art is meant for the interpretation of whomever comes into contact with it. The author has a meaning behind their art, but also wants it to mean different things to different...
Again your retarded criticalthinking you told @deathofhonor in a previous comment "it's what you think someone meant who themselves where quoting someone else and taking the quote out of it's context and giving it a completely new meaning." Your doing the exact same thing. Try not to contradict yourself when you tell someone they're wrong. Cause in reality, the only one who's wrong is you. Music is an art. Art is meant for the interpretation of whomever comes into contact with it. The author has a meaning behind their art, but also wants it to mean different things to different people. So to say your right about what this song means and everyone else is wrong contradicts yourself cause remember "it's what you think someone meant who themselves where quoting someone else and taking the quote out of it's context and giving it a completely new meaning."
You're entire reply is erroneous as you failed to understand the basic premise of my argument. I'm not going to bother with explaining it to you because I feel that if by now it's not entirely clear to you, then there is no hope in paraphrasing it to help you understand it.
You're entire reply is erroneous as you failed to understand the basic premise of my argument. I'm not going to bother with explaining it to you because I feel that if by now it's not entirely clear to you, then there is no hope in paraphrasing it to help you understand it.
"The author has a meaning behind their art, but also wants it to mean different things to different people."
"The author has a meaning behind their art, but also wants it to mean different things to different people."
This may or may not be true. Artist express themselves and people are witnesses of their art. You cannot assume the artist even considers the audience in...
This may or may not be true. Artist express themselves and people are witnesses of their art. You cannot assume the artist even considers the audience in his work. Perhaps in some musical acts this would apply but I'm afraid the wording you chose to express your thought makes it incorrect in most situations. Why would TDWP quote someone else's words to convey a different message? Why not write an entirely new sentence? Logic or proper spelling and syntax are not your strong points. You're plenty fucking stupid though I'll give you that!
"her teeth (show) like white seeds in a scarlet fruit"
I believe that they are talking about Eve biting into the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden in the Bible
Not at all.
Not at all.
Again your retarded criticalthinking you told @deathofhonor in a previous comment "it's what you think someone meant who themselves where quoting someone else and taking the quote out of it's context and giving it a completely new meaning." Your doing the exact same thing. Try not to contradict yourself when you tell someone they're wrong. Cause in reality, the only one who's wrong is you. Music is an art. Art is meant for the interpretation of whomever comes into contact with it. The author has a meaning behind their art, but also wants it to mean different things to different...
Again your retarded criticalthinking you told @deathofhonor in a previous comment "it's what you think someone meant who themselves where quoting someone else and taking the quote out of it's context and giving it a completely new meaning." Your doing the exact same thing. Try not to contradict yourself when you tell someone they're wrong. Cause in reality, the only one who's wrong is you. Music is an art. Art is meant for the interpretation of whomever comes into contact with it. The author has a meaning behind their art, but also wants it to mean different things to different people. So to say your right about what this song means and everyone else is wrong contradicts yourself cause remember "it's what you think someone meant who themselves where quoting someone else and taking the quote out of it's context and giving it a completely new meaning."
You're entire reply is erroneous as you failed to understand the basic premise of my argument. I'm not going to bother with explaining it to you because I feel that if by now it's not entirely clear to you, then there is no hope in paraphrasing it to help you understand it.
You're entire reply is erroneous as you failed to understand the basic premise of my argument. I'm not going to bother with explaining it to you because I feel that if by now it's not entirely clear to you, then there is no hope in paraphrasing it to help you understand it.
"The author has a meaning behind their art, but also wants it to mean different things to different people."
"The author has a meaning behind their art, but also wants it to mean different things to different people."
This may or may not be true. Artist express themselves and people are witnesses of their art. You cannot assume the artist even considers the audience in...
This may or may not be true. Artist express themselves and people are witnesses of their art. You cannot assume the artist even considers the audience in his work. Perhaps in some musical acts this would apply but I'm afraid the wording you chose to express your thought makes it incorrect in most situations. Why would TDWP quote someone else's words to convey a different message? Why not write an entirely new sentence? Logic or proper spelling and syntax are not your strong points. You're plenty fucking stupid though I'll give you that!