This is a great song, but what about the line where he says, "I've got a WOMAN that'll put roses on my grave". Shouldn't it be "who'll" and not "that'll"?
I mean, I suppose he could be implying just the fact that he has a woman will put roses on his grave, but wouldn't it makes sense to imply that he has a woman who would PUT roses on his grave? I dunno just seems a little off to me.
It could be just a grammatical error, but it's a biggie imo. I don't like the way it implies that a woman is an "it".
This song is amazingly beautiful.
It could be just a grammatical error, but it's a biggie imo. I don't like the way it implies that a woman is an "it".
This song is amazingly beautiful.
This is a great song, but what about the line where he says, "I've got a WOMAN that'll put roses on my grave". Shouldn't it be "who'll" and not "that'll"?
I mean, I suppose he could be implying just the fact that he has a woman will put roses on his grave, but wouldn't it makes sense to imply that he has a woman who would PUT roses on his grave? I dunno just seems a little off to me.
It could be just a grammatical error, but it's a biggie imo. I don't like the way it implies that a woman is an "it". This song is amazingly beautiful.
It could be just a grammatical error, but it's a biggie imo. I don't like the way it implies that a woman is an "it". This song is amazingly beautiful.