@ThrilledByMusic I personally don't think this is a bad cover. I prefer a band put their own style onto an original rather than simply replicate the sound of the original. It has nothing on the original, I'll give you that, but it isn't that bad (very brave to cover such a legendary song).
@ThrilledByMusic I personally don't think this is a bad cover. I prefer a band put their own style onto an original rather than simply replicate the sound of the original. It has nothing on the original, I'll give you that, but it isn't that bad (very brave to cover such a legendary song).
what a terrible cover, I don't understand why you cover a great song if you can't cover it good. waste of time. damn
@ThrilledByMusic I personally don't think this is a bad cover. I prefer a band put their own style onto an original rather than simply replicate the sound of the original. It has nothing on the original, I'll give you that, but it isn't that bad (very brave to cover such a legendary song).
@ThrilledByMusic I personally don't think this is a bad cover. I prefer a band put their own style onto an original rather than simply replicate the sound of the original. It has nothing on the original, I'll give you that, but it isn't that bad (very brave to cover such a legendary song).