I also agree with ChristAlphaOmega that the chorus has an obvious afterlife-question reference. However, you don't have to be a missionary while explaining a song with a vague religious connections. I won't even get into the invalidity of your arguments because it would be a wasted effort. If you'll notice, the song is called QUESTION, and you are trying to spin it as an answer. Get over yourself.
Hey, I agree with you and everything about the meaning but just because Someone has different beliefs than you doesn't give you the write to shoot them down. Get over YOURSelf since you think you know everything.
Hey, I agree with you and everything about the meaning but just because Someone has different beliefs than you doesn't give you the write to shoot them down. Get over YOURSelf since you think you know everything.
Terricotta, what you just said doesn't really make sense. ChristAlphaOmega's words, I felt, were hinting at intolerance and kinda challenging. It read aggressively towards anyone with a different point of view towards god and the afterlife. I guess you could say I'm agnostic, and I don't know. So I'm kind of offended when anyone says they KNOW, and declares their right in the way ChristAlphaOmega did. Interpretations of songs or anything else is a place for opinions, and opinions are NOT facts. Inhib was not shooting down his beliefs, he was shooting down his ARGUMENTS. (how he presented his beliefs)...
Terricotta, what you just said doesn't really make sense. ChristAlphaOmega's words, I felt, were hinting at intolerance and kinda challenging. It read aggressively towards anyone with a different point of view towards god and the afterlife. I guess you could say I'm agnostic, and I don't know. So I'm kind of offended when anyone says they KNOW, and declares their right in the way ChristAlphaOmega did. Interpretations of songs or anything else is a place for opinions, and opinions are NOT facts. Inhib was not shooting down his beliefs, he was shooting down his ARGUMENTS. (how he presented his beliefs) Inhib was getting at the fact that NOBODY knows everything, not that he himself knew everything. I guess one could say your interpretations are of inhib's words are wrong, but that's an opinion now, isn't it?
I also agree with ChristAlphaOmega that the chorus has an obvious afterlife-question reference. However, you don't have to be a missionary while explaining a song with a vague religious connections. I won't even get into the invalidity of your arguments because it would be a wasted effort. If you'll notice, the song is called QUESTION, and you are trying to spin it as an answer. Get over yourself.
Hey, I agree with you and everything about the meaning but just because Someone has different beliefs than you doesn't give you the write to shoot them down. Get over YOURSelf since you think you know everything.
Hey, I agree with you and everything about the meaning but just because Someone has different beliefs than you doesn't give you the write to shoot them down. Get over YOURSelf since you think you know everything.
Terricotta, what you just said doesn't really make sense. ChristAlphaOmega's words, I felt, were hinting at intolerance and kinda challenging. It read aggressively towards anyone with a different point of view towards god and the afterlife. I guess you could say I'm agnostic, and I don't know. So I'm kind of offended when anyone says they KNOW, and declares their right in the way ChristAlphaOmega did. Interpretations of songs or anything else is a place for opinions, and opinions are NOT facts. Inhib was not shooting down his beliefs, he was shooting down his ARGUMENTS. (how he presented his beliefs)...
Terricotta, what you just said doesn't really make sense. ChristAlphaOmega's words, I felt, were hinting at intolerance and kinda challenging. It read aggressively towards anyone with a different point of view towards god and the afterlife. I guess you could say I'm agnostic, and I don't know. So I'm kind of offended when anyone says they KNOW, and declares their right in the way ChristAlphaOmega did. Interpretations of songs or anything else is a place for opinions, and opinions are NOT facts. Inhib was not shooting down his beliefs, he was shooting down his ARGUMENTS. (how he presented his beliefs) Inhib was getting at the fact that NOBODY knows everything, not that he himself knew everything. I guess one could say your interpretations are of inhib's words are wrong, but that's an opinion now, isn't it?