Definitely, it's about a difference in point of view from the world generally and humans (their androcentric p.o.v and attitude to the world generally). As humans we like to think that there is purpose for us within the world, and that it was somehow meant "for us". Vedder refutes this, by arguing that actually it's an "accident", and therefore is no more "for us", than for any other vegetation or animal specie on the planet...?
Definitely, it's about a difference in point of view from the world generally and humans (their androcentric p.o.v and attitude to the world generally). As humans we like to think that there is purpose for us within the world, and that it was somehow meant "for us". Vedder refutes this, by arguing that actually it's an "accident", and therefore is no more "for us", than for any other vegetation or animal specie on the planet...?