I agree with madchester...the original ROCKS, and the No Doubt version is crappy!
I don't know how much truth there is to this, but I heard they wrote the song b/c they were Pro-Animal Rights, and it was meant to be from a pet's point of view toward their owner. Silly as that may sound, it kind of makes sense to me, b/c pets love their owners unconditionally, and all they expect in return is that same unconditional love. I also heard that the band donated a large portion of the earnings from this song to several humane societies. If I remember correctly, they let the humane society use this song in a commercial, back in the 80's.
Like I said, -I don't know how much truth there is to that, and I'm sure that anybody who reads this will think I'm a lunatic, but I can see where it makes sense.
@Miss Darkk I'm not sure if this is the case or not but I do see what you are saying. The song really does seem to be from someone (two or four legged) in a submissive position to one in a position of dominance. This really could be from a pet to a human.
@Miss Darkk I'm not sure if this is the case or not but I do see what you are saying. The song really does seem to be from someone (two or four legged) in a submissive position to one in a position of dominance. This really could be from a pet to a human.
@Miss Darkk it could be an empathy from unrequited or ill advised love to the position of pets or indeed nature. That also makes more sense of the refusal to lip synch the video, if he's standing in for those speechless.
@Miss Darkk it could be an empathy from unrequited or ill advised love to the position of pets or indeed nature. That also makes more sense of the refusal to lip synch the video, if he's standing in for those speechless.
@Miss Darkk Hi, I agree with you, possibly because I want it to be so. The video completely backs this up. They could have chosen any theme, but happened to show a long list of species ( have you seen the comments in which one guy lists scientific name of each one, it is awesome!), living their lives and doing so ironically in a zoo I think. I am above all an animal advocate. I am also a serious Hollis/TT fan ????❤️❤️❤️
@Miss Darkk Hi, I agree with you, possibly because I want it to be so. The video completely backs this up. They could have chosen any theme, but happened to show a long list of species ( have you seen the comments in which one guy lists scientific name of each one, it is awesome!), living their lives and doing so ironically in a zoo I think. I am above all an animal advocate. I am also a serious Hollis/TT fan ????❤️❤️❤️
I agree with madchester...the original ROCKS, and the No Doubt version is crappy!
I don't know how much truth there is to this, but I heard they wrote the song b/c they were Pro-Animal Rights, and it was meant to be from a pet's point of view toward their owner. Silly as that may sound, it kind of makes sense to me, b/c pets love their owners unconditionally, and all they expect in return is that same unconditional love. I also heard that the band donated a large portion of the earnings from this song to several humane societies. If I remember correctly, they let the humane society use this song in a commercial, back in the 80's. Like I said, -I don't know how much truth there is to that, and I'm sure that anybody who reads this will think I'm a lunatic, but I can see where it makes sense.
@Miss Darkk I'm not sure if this is the case or not but I do see what you are saying. The song really does seem to be from someone (two or four legged) in a submissive position to one in a position of dominance. This really could be from a pet to a human.
@Miss Darkk I'm not sure if this is the case or not but I do see what you are saying. The song really does seem to be from someone (two or four legged) in a submissive position to one in a position of dominance. This really could be from a pet to a human.
@Miss Darkk it could be an empathy from unrequited or ill advised love to the position of pets or indeed nature. That also makes more sense of the refusal to lip synch the video, if he's standing in for those speechless.
@Miss Darkk it could be an empathy from unrequited or ill advised love to the position of pets or indeed nature. That also makes more sense of the refusal to lip synch the video, if he's standing in for those speechless.
@Miss Darkk Hi, I agree with you, possibly because I want it to be so. The video completely backs this up. They could have chosen any theme, but happened to show a long list of species ( have you seen the comments in which one guy lists scientific name of each one, it is awesome!), living their lives and doing so ironically in a zoo I think. I am above all an animal advocate. I am also a serious Hollis/TT fan ????❤️❤️❤️
@Miss Darkk Hi, I agree with you, possibly because I want it to be so. The video completely backs this up. They could have chosen any theme, but happened to show a long list of species ( have you seen the comments in which one guy lists scientific name of each one, it is awesome!), living their lives and doing so ironically in a zoo I think. I am above all an animal advocate. I am also a serious Hollis/TT fan ????❤️❤️❤️