kaat's Journal

  • 2 Entries
  • A Theory of Everything

    by kaat on October 05, 2012

    A Theory of Everything

     

    This is something I've been working on for years. A full discussion can be found here.


    Everything is what it is, and is also the opposite of what it is, at the same time. Everything we experience is symmetrical waves on an otherwise still pool. This explains everything.


    I'm sorry this is so long, but I feel it needs to be. See if you think it's worth the effort. I will make any further posts much more concise.

    Probably the best way for me to begin explaining is with examples.

    One person might see a glass with some water in it as being half-full. Another sees it as half-empty. So which is it? My answer - it's both, at all times. To mirror the theory, it is what it is, and is also the opposite. To extend the thinking to everything is not immediately so simple. But it works, to amazing effect.

    If each glass-observer develops interpretations of the universe based on what they see, we get divergent perspectives. Yet those perspectives were actually based on the same thing. Consider that each of our total world perspectives are similarly based on our previous and subsequent findings, and you begin to see those perspectives as nothing more than lattice-works of deceit. There is no such thing as perspective, except in our minds. Just as there is no such thing as time.

    Whatever thing (any thing) is in question - the glass in this case, therefore has properties in common with quantum theory. We don't really know what the glass is, and can only report it's appearance at any given point. Or, if we do know what the glass is, we can predict what it's appearance will be at any point. What obscures this vision is our tendency to set early impressions in stone, often forever more. It's a question of our need to settle for answers as to what anything really is. How could we live without doing that? More on this below.

    I believe this also explains the origin of faith. E.g.: Our general faith that an apple will fall downwards when we drop it. It does seem to do so every time. Science describes the reason why, but science also knows that the apple could most certainly fall upwards, for various reasons (like, say, some metal was embedded in it, and a magnet was used to pull it upwards).

    So do apples fall up or down? Both, at the same time. Mostly not the same apple, but even that could happen. Such dualities, as pondered in quantum theory, and now according to my theory, are not what we previously thought they were. We thought they were an impasse, and that we had to accept an inability to see more than one key property at a time. Not so.

    I propose that my theory covers everything, or that's the goal. But it's just a tool. A new paradigm for assessing, well, everything. So is it anything more than some kind of philosophical adjunct? Absolutely. Once the theory is fully realized, it inevitably gives us a whole new way of understanding and interpreting everything. From the finest details of science, to the highest metaphysical concepts.

    Now, with the above in mind, if you start playing with it, you'll find that the theory fits with everything in some way. It may appear to be different ways at first, but really it's not. The way I've been testing it for years is to always be asking if there's anything I can't consider in this way. There hasn't been.

    To refer back to quantum theory; it centers around having to accept that we can only know probabilities, not absolutes. If you're thinking that quantum mechanics only apply to the sub-atomic realm, well that's not really true, and it actually doesn't matter anyway. It's only the essence of quantum thinking that we need here. The dualities, so says my theory, are not necessarily problems. They also represent choices. Choices that in fact we humans need to be careful NOT to make. Making such a choice is an act of denial. Denial of our inability to "know" anything for sure.

    Has it occurred to you, that when asked any question, wherein the asker seeks a binary judgement in response, you falter, because you instinctively know that any such judgement is flawed? For example, "Was the movie good?". Chances are you felt it was good in some way, and bad in another. Either you settle for, and give, the closest answer - it was good, or it was bad. Or, you begin to explain how it was both. Something else to think about - if you actually thought the movie was all good, you definitely missed what was bad about it. I mean, it cost you $12 and two hours to see, didn't it? And so on. So far, I haven't found a situation that doesn't get entangled in this trap.

    So how could we live without faith of any kind? Referring back to my theory summary, if we could all live without faith, it would be equivalent to eliminating all the waves in the pool. In our real world, all is waves; our waves, started by us, and amplified by us. Interference everywhere. We're never going to get very far if we're constantly caught up in all the confusion.

    You want tolerance, peace, unity, and all the rest of it? This is the way to get there. We would all wake up and realize that we know nothing. Our very thoughts, all of them, are worthless. They're just echoes of all that confusion, preying on our minds. If we got it straight, we would have no need to think about anything at all. Why, then, would we ever have needed such advanced brains? Well, we would never arrive at this "right view" without them. Of course, it doesn't mean we'll stop thinking; just that our subconscious competencies will change drastically. We feel the need to "think" about our part, our influence on, or our influence from, everything. But it's not necessary.

    If you're getting the hang of it, try this: Knowing what you now know, consider that everything I have said here is both true, and false - that's the law. It might seem crazy at first, but if you work through it, you'll find it's true. And false. It's probably not good to over-think it, because it's like peeling back each layer of an onion, looking for the part that can't be peeled back. Ain't gonna happen. But again, it's us, as the uninitiated, needing constant reminders that we know nothing. Stop it - you don't know ANYTHING!

    And finally, for now, if you don't know anything, then according to my law, you also know everything. Right now, I'm just looking for people who can relate, and who might contribute to pursuing it.

    Thanks.

    No Comments
  • Canadian Music

    by kaat on March 07, 2012
    This is post I made to a forum, when challenged to name some good Canadian music... Canadian music has a lot to offer, perhaps disproportionately so. This list is more art, less chart (Celine doesn't need the help!). These are only some of my favorites - there's just so many. * means extra special to me. ** Rheostatics (www.rheostatics.ca) ** Martin Tielli (www.martintielli.ca) ** Martin Lomas (www.storm-animal.blogspot.com) * Arcade Fire * Bran Van 3000 * Buffy Sainte-Marie * Change of Heart * Daniel Lanois * Doughboys * Farm Fresh * Glenn Gould * Godspeed You! Black Emperor * Great Lake Swimmers * Jane Siberry * k-os * Karkwa * King Cobb Steelie * Laura Barrett * Lenny Breau * Mary Margaret O'Hara * Matthew Good * Michael Brook * Nick Buzz * Oliver Schroer * Scott Merritt * Sea Snakes * Wooden Stars A Silver Mt. Zion Alexisonfire Andy Stochansky Ben Heppner Big Sugar Big Wreck Bob Wiseman Broken Social Scene Bruce Cockburn Buck 65 Carole Pope Chad VanGaalen City and Colour Corb Lund Dallas Green David Wilcox Drake Ed Bickert Eric's Trip Feist Hrsta Jeff Martin Jim Guthrie Joni Mitchell Julie Doiron Jully Black Junior Boys k.d. lang Kate and Anna McGarrigle Kathleen Edwards Kid Koala Kurt Swinghammer La Bottine Souriante Leonard Cohen Leslie Spit Treeo Lindi Ortega Liona Boyd Luke Doucet Luther Wright and the Wrongs Madagascar Slim Marc Jordan Martha Wainwright Maureen Forrester Measha Brueggergosman Mendelson Joe Meryn Cadell Metric Montag MSTRKRFT Neil Young Odds Oliver Jones Oscar Peterson Patrick Watson Plants and Animals Richie Hawtin Robbie Robertson Rufus Wainwright Rush Sam Roberts Band Sarah Harmer Sarah McLachlan Sarah Slean Set Fire to Flames Shalabi Effect Sixtoo Sloan Stan Rogers Stars The Dears The Gandharvas The Hidden Cameras The Inbreds The Most Serene Republic The Shuffle Demons The Super Friendz The Tea Party The Tragically Hip The Waltons Treble Charger Veda Hille Venetian Snares vitaminsforyou Weeping Tile Willie P. Bennett
    No Comments